Menu

Why Arsenal’s performance against West Ham epitomises where they stand under Arteta

0 GettyImages-1308281075

The nature of Arsenal’s season was perfectly summed up by their showing at the London Stadium, as their combination of inconsistency and brilliance saw them come from three goals down to draw with West Ham.

If ever there was a game that could highlight not only the progress Arsenal have made since the turn of the year, but also the amount of work needed in order to become a top team again, it was their performance against West Ham.

From the first whistle, they were second best all over the pitch, struggling to cope with the intensity shown by the hosts and void of any attacking threat. The Hammers were able to pull Arsenal out of their shape with some fluid passing patterns and frankly looked a class above in the opening exchanges.

An unbelievable Jesse Lingard strike put West Ham ahead after a quarter of an hour and two minutes later they doubled their lead when Jared Bowen finished off the Manchester United loanee’s quick free-kick. Tomas Soucek got in on the act to seemingly put the game out of sight, with Arsenal fans looking on and wondering just how embarrassing it could get.

As the clock ticked over to the 32 minute mark, Mikel Arteta’s side were staring down the barrel of their most humiliating defeat under his reign, as it appeared that old habits had came back to haunt them once more.

However, on this occasion Arsenal showed something that they had been lacking since the early days under Arsene Wenger, which was belief. Over the past few years, this isn’t a trait that has been associated with them very often, as their soft underbelly has been exposed numerous times especially when up against it.

But moments after going three down, Arsenal sprung into life almost, as if it had taken them to be nearly out the game to realise that they needed to wake up and start playing. Before the break, they clawed one back when Alexandre Lacazette’s effort was deflected in off Soucek to gift them a lifeline in the second half.

Whatever Arteta said to his players at the interval certainly had an effect, as the away side came out with renewed confidence and assurance, following up their first-goal with another one when Callum Chambers’ cross was put in his own net by Craig Dawson. The theme of Arsenal dominance continued throughout the half and they finally completed the comeback when Lacazette headed home Nicolas Pepe’s cross from close-range eight minutes from time.

117653801 gettyimages-1308278845

The contrast between the two halves was night and day, as the Gunners started the game looking lost and lacking any sort of desire, but grew into it steadily whilst displaying all the type of characteristics any top team should. It was symbolic of their season, as they’ve struggled to build any sort of momentum, and it only adds to the frustration for fans to see the potential Arteta’s men possess when they are fully firing.

Heading into the campaign, there were high hopes for Arsenal and having come off the back of winning the FA Cup, a sense of optimism was starting to engulf the club. However, these hopes were quickly dashed when they made their worst ever start to a Premier League season, claiming just 13 points from the first 12 games.

Arteta’s hybrid 3-4-3 formation provided much needed defensive stability, leading to the Gunners keeping more clean sheets than usual, but their distinct lack of creativity proved to be the catalyst for the poor start. Playing without a player to operate between the lines to link the midfield to the attack meant Arsenal were struggling to score goals, therefore it forced the Spaniard into switching up his approach in order to find a better balance.

Youngster Emile Smith Rowe was thrown in for his first start in a 4-2-3-1 formation against Chelsea on Boxing Day and Arsenal haven’t looked back since. Although he only made a short cameo against West Ham, it was fellow playmaker Martin Ødegaard who took centre stage, operating in the Englishman’s natural position.

Without doubt, the decision to bring in a player to find spaces between the opposition midfield has been pivotal to their upturn in form, as seen in this fixture Ødegaard was a key component of the attack and created multiple openings for his teammates.

Another aspect that was evident in the second half, which wasn’t there in the first, is the way they were aggressive in the press. Since the turn of the year, a key reason that progress has made is because of Arteta’s willingness to reintroduce the basics of his philosophy, that served him so well last season. The way in which the front four pressed from the front caused West Ham to go long, making it easier to regain possession and sustain pressure, when the hosts began to tire.

Despite the positives in the end, one major concern is the form of star striker and captain Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang. He’s currently enduring his most difficult spell in English football, since arriving just over three years ago, and cut a disinterested figure on the left-wing at the London Stadium.

The 31-year-old has been Arsenal’s most prolific goalscorer in recent times, but his struggles on and off the pitch have been clear to see this season. With a place in the top six and the Europa League still up for grabs, Arteta will need to find a tune out of his main man, if they are to achieve anything meaningful from now until May.

All in all, it was a display that put into perspective where Arsenal are as a club, and at this moment the key is consistency. The last week highlights this perfectly, as Arteta possesses a squad that can dominate the north London derby from start to finish, while showing the tactical understanding to execute his game-plan in order to claim victory. Then in the next game puts in a lifeless performance in the Europa League, showing little signs of improvement, followed by West Ham where they showed the very best and worst of the team in one 90 minutes.

, , , , , , , , ,

6 Responses to Why Arsenal’s performance against West Ham epitomises where they stand under Arteta

  1. satish pema March 22, 2021 at 11:07 am #

    Good article, but all about the teams performance. Nothing about the Managers failings. Why is the inconsistency not addressed. Bad game management, poor subs and timing of subs. In this game when Xhaka subbed for ESR it weaken the defense and added nothing to attack, Aubameyang left on too long. The manager decision making and reading of game very poor.
    Your say his half time talk up the performance, but that happened after 30 minutes in the first half. Sorry, I feel the manager has had plenty of time to show his skills, but there is no sign of improvement, just more sign of standing still. The squad is reasonable good. This team reflects the Managers failings.

    • James Humphreys March 22, 2021 at 11:44 am #

      Thanks Satish. I do agree that Arteta is more reactionary rather than proactive with his subs in general, but I can understand why he was reluctant to change anything sooner yesterday. We were completely in control during the second half and looked dangerous every time we went forward, it felt like a matter of time before we broke them down. The ESR sub was a gamble, as they did have a few chances after he came on, but it ultimately paid off as we managed to get back into the game. Main criticism would be Auba staying on for too long as he added nothing from the left.

      Of course the manager is to blame as well as the position in the league isn’t acceptable (perhaps I should have included a section on this), I feel like he’s got a lot to learn, but the facts are that years of poor recruitment and mismanagement from board level meant it was never going to be an overnight process. We’ve already started clearing out the dead wood and there’s still so much more to do in the summer, but since the turn of the year I definitely see progress, despite being awful at times yesterday the comeback signified the direction we are going under Arteta.

      • allezkev March 23, 2021 at 10:42 pm #

        Thanks for the post James but not sure about criticising the Board for the signings, they sign off on the finance and take advice from the manager and CEO, be that Edelman or Gazides, but it’s the manager or as it is now Director of Football who decide on the transfer policy…

        • James Humphreys March 23, 2021 at 10:51 pm #

          Apologies, didn’t mean for that sentence to come across like that, was naming poor recruitment and board mismanagement as two separate points. As you said they are recommended players, therefore transfers can’t solely be their fault, but can see why you thought I said that due to the way I worded it.

          • allezkev March 24, 2021 at 2:22 pm #

            Hey, no problem James, really enjoyed your post, but I think our recruitment has been mixed for a long long time, possibly all the way back to David Dein being removed, he had the ear and trust of Wenger and possibly encouraged Arsene to complete transfers more readily than he tended to do in later years. We’ve been in a complex situation over the last few years with first Mislintat and then Raul and that hasn’t helped at all but I’m hopeful now that Edu is a safer hand on the tiler…

  2. foreverinourshadows March 22, 2021 at 2:54 pm #

    Arteta is completely out of his depth, he hasn’t got a clue about tactics, his team selections are shocking, he doesn’t know his own eleven. Leno,Xhaka,Luis and Willian continue to put in poor performances, yet he still keeps picking them.Arteta is a novice and for the board to pick him as a manager is downright ludicrous, the same with Edu.This team is going backwards just like his tactics, he has killed the Arsenal DNA, He has to go it’s that simple and use the rest of the season to look for someone who has experience to take us forward, but at the moment it is a shambles, and an emabarrassment to the club.We are Arsenal and we have a novice in charge what a joke

Your thoughts?

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Designed by Batmandela