Why Arteta’s decisions cost Arsenal a place in the 4th Round of the FA Cup


Got his set up all wrong

In hindsight perhaps yesterday was not the best day to opt for my first away trip of this season. However, I was looking forward to Arsenal and Arteta building on the magnificent team performance against City and starting another glorious run in the competition we have won in 4 of the last 8 seasons.

Obviously. I knew the team would be different, with players departing for AFCON, and the opportunity would be taken rotate, but I was not prepared for the news that Smith Rowe and Tomiyasu were unavailable through minor injury and Xhaka through COVID. I have absolutely no doubted that Smith Rowe and Xhaka would have started and maybe the Japanese international might have.


Bemusing timing to say the least

Of course, the unavailability of Xhaka and Smith Rowe, leaving Arteta made the decision to allow Maitland- Niles to go before the weekend, even stranger. It is not as if the player being cup-tied impacted Roma after all. It does not even require hindsight to know that losing Partey and Elneny would leave us light, but the absence of Xkaka as well makes the Maitland- Niles decision virtually negligent.

Most of us wanted Charlie Patino to gain more playing time but envisaged this being in a similar fashion to his debut against Sunderland. Allowing the talented youngster to enter the fray at the City Ground with the game won and the pressure lessened. As it was Arteta left himself being forced to rely on Patino as a starter against a form Championship team and it backfired horribly.


Patino asked to play as a second 8 – (Photo by David Price/Arsenal FC via Getty Images)

However, unlike some, I find the young player almost entirely blameless. Yes, he did not shine but for me, this was down to the manager’s decision to change the team set up from the recently highly successful 4231, to a 4141 deploy Patino and Odegaard as dual ‘8’s and leaving Sambi Lokonga isolated. This isolation was telling in defence but more so as the distances between him and Patino and Odegaard left Arsenal without the strong platform our usual double pivot (both strong passers) provides.

Many seem to be observing that Patino partnered Lokonga and under-performed but for me it appeared he followed his manager’s instruction on position and as a result, whilst he was neat and tidy when he did receive the ball, seldom received it. Watching Arsenal of late has been all about building from the back, with Ramsdale of the centre backs feeding Partey or Xhaka. Yesterday I can only recall Sambi receiving the ball in this fashion on a few occasions. The single CM did not work really early in the season, when we scraped wins over Burnley and Norwich, as I recall, and it was obviously not working yesterday.

Surprising then (understatement) that our manager, so swift to drag off and underperforming Tavares, could not see that the single pivot was hindering the team defensively and hugely impacting the fluidity of our build up in attack. The efficient early service to Saka and Martinelli was no existent and Odegaard and Patino could not exert any influence. I was stunned that after half time that Arteta has not either moved Patino to play with Lokonga in a 4231 or taken the youngster off and put Chambers on as a defensive partner for the Belgian or in defence to allow Ben White to fulfil that function.


White as a DM alongside Sambi?

It was this decision to persevere with the 4141, as much as the decision to stick with Nketiah, who was playing as if his mind was elsewhere, that cost Arsenal their place in this year’s FA Cup. I am a believer in what Arteta is endeavouring to do at my club but yesterday I feel his decision to allow Maitland-Niles to leave early and change the system the structure that has given his team such confidence, not only cost us dearly but could have hindered Patino’s confidence and development.

Fans and media alike are speculating that this is the Spaniard’s way of sending a clear message to the board to invest in January. I sincerely hope this is not the case as I would think less of Arteta because Arsenal are out of a competition that we fans adore for no reason at all that I can see. He and his coaching staff has much to dwell on before 2 matches in 4 days that can define Arsenal’s season and no new signings can alter that!

This is the full, unedited version of yesterday’s Sun Arsenal Fan’s View Column.

, , , , ,

7 Responses to Why Arteta’s decisions cost Arsenal a place in the 4th Round of the FA Cup

  1. Neil Fitt January 11, 2022 at 10:18 am #

    The long ball tactics were nieve,we should have played our normal way of late! Too many changes for consistency! At least the first eleven will have less games to play,putting us on a good chance of championship football at end of season.

    • Dave Seager January 11, 2022 at 11:05 am #

      Been amazed how many thought Charlie played alongside Sambi.

  2. allezkev January 11, 2022 at 11:51 am #

    Nottingham Forest played the low block, parked the bus or put 10 men behind the ball – in old money.

    Credit to the manager and coaches of Forest for that, they put a speed merchant on Martinelli negating his major asset, pace and they put a hitman on Saka who was given several goes at crippling Bakayo by the appalling Pawson (what about the shirt pull on Ben White then Craig?). Then as the game was moving towards it final phases he put on his one experienced striker, got a bit of luck with the handball on the breakaway and bingo.

    The fact that Arteta was like a rabbit in a cars headlights as his team and tactics struggled to make any headway throughout the game without him making any changes up front both surprised and annoyed me.

    Try switching Gabby and Bakayo over and give the opposing wing backs a new problem?

    Switch to three at the back and match the Forest system but don’t do it in the last few minutes when we’re losing, that’s worryingly reactive.

    Niles going to Roma shouldn’t have made one iota of difference as I think it deflects us from the main issue and that is why a strong Arsenal line up was so insipid, so seemingly underprepared and so lacking in desire?

    Yes we have a young team and as anyone who follows youth football will know young players have a propensity to suffer fluctuations in form. Maybe the same applies to young managers and coaching staff?

    • Dave Seager January 11, 2022 at 12:59 pm #

      Yes I back MA but his initial decision baffled me and his inability to change it more so.

  3. CT Gooner January 11, 2022 at 12:28 pm #

    Excellent article Dave…….hit the nail on the head all the way. Incisive, to the point, and much more enjoyable than the game. The result felt inevitable from the start…..I feel sorriest for Patino, he will blame himself but shouldn’t.

    • Dave Seager January 11, 2022 at 12:58 pm #

      Thanks and I hope you are right about Charlie. I know his dad and agent as well as player and he will be fine I am sure.

  4. Melvyn January 11, 2022 at 3:16 pm #

    Although Arteta was dealt a poor hand regarding team selection, with five subs allowed in the FA cup, he perhaps should have changed it up a bit earlier as we could all see how the game was unfolding.

Your thoughts?

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Designed by Batmandela

%d bloggers like this: