Menu

Wenger knows he can take Arsenal no further but is he ready to admit this and do the Honourable thing?

It is easy to get emotional over Saturday’s game and I am no exception so I understand the anger and frustration of the fans. It is an annual experience at this time of year. We are now playing for a top four finish. I could have sat down and written this on Saturday night, but I waited until I am feeling a bit more level headed before I make my comments.

First, though, there is one glaring incident, which I wish to deal with first. I heard the comments on TV about Arsene`s reaction to Bellerin`s injury and on the first goal, and none of them mentioned that it was a blatant foul by Alonso. I thought my eyes had deceived me but I watched the replays and one in particular, seen from the direction of contact. I would invite anyone who has recorded the match to look at it again. The ball dropped into the centre of the goal where Bellerin was positioned, and he jumped to head it clear. He was in the air when Alonso charged in with his forearm held up in front of him and smashed into Bellerin`s face. Our young Spaniard didn`t see it coming because he was concentrating on the ball so he was smashed to the ground unconscious. The incident was referred to on Sunday morning as an “alleged foul”, “a controversial incident” and by Alan Shearer “It was never a foul, he just went in aggressively”. When Conte was asked if he thought it was a foul, he thought carefully and replied with a smile; “not in England, but in every other country- yes” and he gave a little laugh and a shrug of the shoulders.

Image result for bellerin concussed

I would ask one simple question of Shearer; if the roles were reversed and Bellerin had smashed into Alonso like that, would you have said it was a penalty? I can hear the howls of rage from Chelsea if it had happened that way. It would have been a stonewall penalty and probably a dismissal for Bellerin.

Anyway, Chelsea deserved to win. They played exactly as I had predicted in my pre-match article. They were a well-drilled unit and every player moved about when they were off the ball. They moved quickly, defended, and counter-attacked as a unit. I don`t really need to say that, I am sure you have all seen that yourselves. My point is that it was entirely predictable and I suggested that we should have played a back three of Mustafi, Kos and Holding, with Bellerin and perhaps Gibbs or Coquelin as wingbacks and Ox as the attacking midfielder.

If that had happened, Holding would have been in the position that Hazard made his run from to score the second goal. Monreal bombed up the wing all through the match and left Iwobi on his own with a massive gap behind him. Moses had a free run from the right wing, which was a constant threat (as it always is). There was no cohesion in midfield and passes especially from Coquelin were going astray. Chelsea had partnerships all over the pitch. They always had a tackler backed up by a teammate and the nearest player off the ball made himself available for a pass. They were in constant movement whereas, even for throw – ins we had no one moving around who wanted to have the ball. I had said that Wenger depended upon his clever intelligent players to provide solutions to teams like Chelsea and there couldn`t have been a better example of that fallacy than Saturday’s game. It was like watching the Roman army against the ancient Brits.

Wenger has frequently mentioned lately that he is now aware of the intensity of the criticism against him. That is a change from his attitude when we were beaten by Swansea and Watford in quick succession in 2015. At that time he said that he did not listen to the opinion of fans. In my opinion, it has reached the point now where there can be no debate about the fact that he is just not capable of coaching a championship winning team. There are too many more capable coaches out there who can get a team to play to a plan and especially to defend properly. Even modest teams that have decent coaches can frustrate us.

Wenger was fuming at Atkinson's antics

Help club find his successor?

Now at this moment, I have no particular manager in mind to replace him. The employer is not the fans. It is Kroenke and he has confessed that he knows nothing about football. I don`t think there is any argument about that, but he does know a lot about making money from sports clubs, and it would be nigh on impossible for him to find anyone better than Wenger for that purpose. On the other hand, Wenger is football to his backbone and if he is truthful to himself, he must have realised by now that he no longer has the answers to the modern game. He may also have had enough of the vitriol aimed at him and is ready to go himself. If, as I hope it is, he has made up his mind then I think his concentration now should be devoted to preparing the club for a new manager. That means establishing a core of players who will play consistently, to a method and a plan, and who know what their individual contribution should be. It also means staying in the top four, winning the FA cup again as a reward to the fans and putting up a decent performance against Bayern. If he can eliminate the cancer of slow play that has taken over the team in recent seasons, it would be a good start.

, , ,

4 Responses to Wenger knows he can take Arsenal no further but is he ready to admit this and do the Honourable thing?

  1. I.P. from South Africa February 6, 2017 at 8:11 am #

    As we all know by now, Wenger is an egotistical “know-it-all” person who will never admit his own short-comings,
    on top of that he is stubborn and ignores all opinions other than those of his club’s hierarchy. Personally I think
    he is too stubborn to refuse a new contract as his own misplaced self-value will always convince him that there
    is no one else better than him.
    A great shame, however, we will sit with him for as long as he wishes to remain.

  2. Victor Thompson February 6, 2017 at 10:03 am #

    Thanks I.P. You have aptly described a personality defect which Wenger has. Curiously, all great managers need to have that. The difference is that they also have the wisdom to know when their time is up. Alex Ferguson realised that he had done as much as he could and he was getting no younger, so, for the benefit of the team, he stood aside for a younger man. It didn`t work but I think it was because Moyes was dropped in at the deep end. He did not receive the financial support that Mourinho is getting.

    I can only cross my fingers and hope that Wenger has the same insight as Fergie and makes arrangements to stand aside for the benefit of the club.

  3. Travis February 6, 2017 at 8:14 pm #

    I agree with your great article Vic…AW just can’t get his team selection right. If he picks the right starting XI, he sticks Ozil on the left to cover Moses. I’m fine with Iwobi at the 10, but then it has to be Lucas on the left. I think Ox was good against Chelsea, and if Gabriel heads home the sitter, we’re all talking about a great performance by Ox. I would have started Ox versus Watford to get him accustom to CM for the Chelsea match. It only worked out that way because Ramsey got injured on 15 minutes (probably because he walked back too hard on the Deeney goal) and then Ox got 75 minutes at CM.

    As far as tactics…the spacing was horrible on Saturday. The constant need to play one style and one style only is frustrating. The defensive cohesion…we’ll there was none. Monreal actually had some good crosses for the first time that I can remember, but against a 3-4-3 he cannot dart forward every single possession. Maybe he becomes aggressive on 70 minutes to get back in the game, but there were gaps all over the field in the first half.

    My main issue with this last week is the transfer window. AW knows that the Chelsea match he will be without Cazorla (oh Santi, we miss you) Xhaka and Elneny and decides a Coq-Ramsey pairing will get the job done. I get it, there is not too many Cazorla’s out there in the market, but Ramsey clearly has shown since Arteta retired, he is not that man. Would you spend £40 to save a midfield in January? I would in a heartbeat.

    Aa far as the transfer window and full backs…I throw the checkbook at Jose Gaya and if he says no, turn around and do the same to Ricardo Rodriguez. When Gabriel plays more than 45 minutes at full back, you have a glaring need. I thought Wenger had a good summer window. He didn’t get Lacazette, but it turns out Sanchez is quite potent at CF.

    As far as Sanchez on the left…does he do anything other than cut inside, slow the play up and loft in crosses with minimal accuracy? I love Sanchez and his work rate…but this season has shown he’s far more effective in the center of the pitch, pressing the back line. Yet, after the Man City match, he reverts him to the wing.

    I think Arsenal will lose one or both of Ozil and Sanchez…and if one leaves I hope it’s Ozil, because Iwobi and JRA look the real deal. There is no Gunner equivalent to Sanchez.

    From a frustrated Gooner…COYG!

  4. Victor Thompson February 7, 2017 at 10:25 am #

    Thanks Travis, you make some good points. The best temporary measure Wenger could make would be to have Martin Keown or Tony Adams to come in immediately and coach our defenders on how to defend. I think Ox shows enough promise to earn a run in the team as an offensive mid fielder.

Your thoughts?

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Designed by Batmandela